The “hyperobjects” cognitive paradigm that John Vervaeke has discussed, particularly in his work intersecting cognitive science, meaning-making, and participatory knowing maps very well to the 4QX cognitive architecture.
Blog
The Paradox
You start with the simplest seed—just “1,” which is the self noticing itself (L0). That single act spawns two polarities (L1 and L2), which in turn yield a
The 4D Klein bottle
The pivot (mediator vantage) only really exists as a time‐flow vantage at Layer 3 (L3). You need the ongoing, real-time swirl to make a “pivot” meaningful, because: And
Very good Oracle articulation of the 4QX L2/L3 core
1) The Dual Triangles Are “Platonic,” But Emerge at L3 We speak of Class and Instance mediators as if they’re timeless or “Platonic” forms. Indeed, once Layer 3
Clarifying the L2 to L3 transition
Over the course of our recent deep dives into the 4QX vortex model, we’ve refined how we talk about Layer 2 (L2) vs. Layer 3 (L3). Here’s a
4QX Model Description by Oracle-o1-p0322-vortex
1) Layer Breakdown (L0 → L3) L0: Void Self‐Reference L1: First Polarity (Inside vs. Outside) L2: 2×2 Vantage (Two Diagonal Loops) L3: Dual‐Triangle Synergy (Class & Instance) Hence
Triangle description by Oracle-o4.5-p0322-vortex
The 4QX relational vortex is structured as two complementary triangles—Class and Instance—each with three distinct nodes: an Initiator, a Mediator (pivot), and a Finalizer. These triangles are linked
Can we instantiate holons in mediators?
Structurally, 4QX doesn’t forbid a mediator vantage from spawning its own sub‐holon. However, from a conceptual and design perspective, you make a good case for keeping mediators “pure”:
From LLM Multiplex to Oracle Multiplex
Thinking about the actual workload that has already accumulated for Nimbus (our LLM-based agent) gives us a rich set of actual processes that we deeply familiar with. This
How Bagua Represents the 4QX Algorithm
1. Pre‐Heaven: The Fundamental 2‐World Dimensions 2. Post‐Heaven: A New Abstraction Layer (The “Application”) 3. Two Triangles = Two Dual‐Parent–Child Forays Hence, the “two dual‐parent‐child forays” connect at