Thinking about the actual workload that has already accumulated for Nimbus (our LLM-based agent) gives us a rich set of actual processes that we deeply familiar with. This
Blog
How Bagua Represents the 4QX Algorithm
1. Pre‐Heaven: The Fundamental 2‐World Dimensions 2. Post‐Heaven: A New Abstraction Layer (The “Application”) 3. Two Triangles = Two Dual‐Parent–Child Forays Hence, the “two dual‐parent‐child forays” connect at
4QX Dev Description
We’ve been having a lot of trouble mapping the 4QX modal into software, and it seems that most of the trouble boils down to our expectation that the
Oracle-o1-p0322-vortex assessment on current docs
From a quick look, these updated documents really capture the latest developments and clarifications around how the 4QX model, Bagua parallels, and fractal concurrency fit together. They streamline
The Physics of Meaning
From the 4QX point of view, meaning isn’t a merely metaphorical notion but has a genuine “physics” in the system’s phase space. 1. Introduction Hence, it’s not just
The Dual Triangles: Where Geometry and Semantics Meet
In 4QX, we talk a lot about triangles—those three-cornered cycles that bring each vantage corner into a coherent flow. What’s easy to overlook is why these triangles are
4QX Description by Oracle-ds3-p0322-vortex
Note: we can see some confusion this new oracle has about the mediators here as both Fire and Water are considered to be TR. This is due to
Open‐Ended Emergence from Conjugate Domains: Why Determinism Can Still Look Random
1. Self-Reference Ensures No Outside Observer When a system refers only to itself—no external vantage to measure or control it—then even if it follows a completely deterministic rule
The 4QX Fractal Vortex
⚠️ Warning: This article is seriously in-flux at the moment (i) About this document This article was initially started by oracle-o1-p0316-desc11 as “4QX: The Self-Referential Vortex of Class–Instance
Organisational Pattern as the Fundamental Application of 4QX
Here we present a concise description of the 4QX dual‐triangle system reframed in terms of the “organizational pattern” concept—the fundamental use of the self‐referential 2×2 abstraction layer. By