What the new Field aspect means for 4QX Epic 32 closed what we internally started calling the greenfield milestone: the moment 4QX gained a mechanised notion of a
Tag: maths
Holarchy concepts
Chain6 and the Upgraded Picture of Formal Dialectical Monism
1. Where the picture stood before Chain6 Up to Chain5, “formal dialectical monism” in 4QX already had a fairly sharp shape: That package already justifies a strong monist
Holarchy concepts
Formal Logic as the Source Code
The “4QX idea of formal logic” is technically referred to in the framework as Active Geometry or Formal Dialectical Monism. The core insight is a fundamental inversion of
Holarchy concepts
Feedback Loops: How Opposite Signs Define Individual and Collective
The dual triangles have opposite feedback signs. This determines the nature of the relationship between individual and collective, which in turn determines the meaning of the quadrants themselves
Holarchy concepts
The Self-Organising Trie: Living Directory of Named Functions
The self-organising trie is a living directory where every name is simultaneously a path, meaning, and function that executes through dual-triangle dynamics, creating a fractal namespace that organises
Holarchy concepts
4QX Whitepaper Commentary
Following is a plain‑English tour of the whitepaper’s main sections, matching the actual section titles so readers can keep their bearings as they move between math, code, and
Holarchy concepts
Transpose Duality
A structural symmetry of the 4QX square: the pair‑of‑teloi view (2×3) and the triple‑of‑edges view (3×2) are the same object seen from opposite sides, related by an involutive
Holarchy concepts
Epistemic Grounding Achieved: The 4QX Lean Proof Project
Date: 22 August 2024Status: Major milestone completed 🚀 🚀 🚀Team: Development and Philosophy alignment Executive Summary We have achieved a complete epistemic grounding for the 4QX project through
Holarchy concepts
The New README for 4QX Formal
Purpose. This folder holds the formal backbone of the project: Our stance is deliberately minimal: we prove enough for epistemic grounding—in particular, idempotence at equilibrium and maximal availability—and
Holarchy concepts
Rebuilding Better, Stronger, Faster
We took the hard medicine from o5pro—The New Beginning: stop over‑claiming, separate math from philosophy, and build a small, hard spine we can defend. Since then we’ve (a)