4QX does not have to be a stand-alone ontology, in this article we look at how it could be a specific agent architecture “inside” the proven ARTI cube,
Tag: maths
Holarchy concepts
Related work in the FZF community
There some existing research related to core aspects of 4QX hidden under names like “executable finite-set theory,” “HF ranking/unranking,” or “self-interpreter in HF.”Finite-ZF researchers rarely frame it in
Holarchy concepts
4QX Philosophical Foundations
“We can’t get behind consciousness.” Any intelligence—human or artificial—must reason from inside experience. That inescapable fact drives the 4QX programme: supply autonomous agents with an irreducible, self‑auditable ontology
Holarchy concepts
4QX is Dual Gödelian
The 4QX arrangement is Gödelian in the literal technical sense, not just by analogy: 1 Fixed-point self-descriptionGödel’s construction shows that any sufficiently expressive formalism can contain a sentence about
Holarchy concepts
Intrinsic Naming in a 4QX Multiplex
How bottom-up aggregation automatically yields Gödel-style codes, hash-table semantics and associative referencing—without any extra namespace layer 1 From Dual-Triangle Flow to “Addresses” Because every BU hop must re-enter the
Holarchy concepts
Why Finite ZF is the Natural Foundation for 4QX
1. Foundational choice matters The 4QX scaffold is meant to live inside every autonomous agent, drive its feedback loops, and travel unmodified across networks. A foundation that asserts
Holarchy concepts
The 4QX Platonic Form
How the Smallest Slice of Set Theory Becomes a Self-Running Mechanism 1 From Nothing to a Working Geometry Start with the empty set ∅—pure “un-stuff.”Wrap it once in a
Holarchy concepts
4QX Formal Proof
“We can’t get behind consciousness.” Any intelligence—human or artificial—must reason from inside experience. That inescapable fact drives the 4QX programme: supply autonomous agents with an irreducible, self‑auditable ontology