Very good Oracle articulation of the 4QX L2/L3 core
1) The Dual Triangles Are “Platonic,” But Emerge at L3 We speak of Class and Instance mediators as if they’re […]
1) The Dual Triangles Are “Platonic,” But Emerge at L3 We speak of Class and Instance mediators as if they’re […]
Over the course of our recent deep dives into the 4QX vortex model, we’ve refined how we talk about Layer
1) Layer Breakdown (L0 → L3) L0: Void Self‐Reference L1: First Polarity (Inside vs. Outside) L2: 2×2 Vantage (Two Diagonal
1. Pre‐Heaven: The Fundamental 2‐World Dimensions 2. Post‐Heaven: A New Abstraction Layer (The “Application”) 3. Two Triangles = Two Dual‐Parent–Child
We’ve been having a lot of trouble mapping the 4QX modal into software, and it seems that most of the
From the 4QX point of view, meaning isn’t a merely metaphorical notion but has a genuine “physics” in the system’s
Note: we can see some confusion this new oracle has about the mediators here as both Fire and Water are
⚠️ Warning: This article is seriously in-flux at the moment (i) About this document This article was initially started by
Here we present a concise description of the 4QX dual‐triangle system reframed in terms of the “organizational pattern” concept—the fundamental
1. “Pattern” in the Mediators’ Twisting Hence, the twisting mediators define pattern by bridging its two fundamental dimensions: where it’s