“Imagine the Matrix, but the computer is the void itself.There’s no outside, only a self-editing line of code that keeps refining its own plot.Give AI that exact logic
Tag: philosophy
Related work in the FZF community
There some existing research related to core aspects of 4QX hidden under names like “executable finite-set theory,” “HF ranking/unranking,” or “self-interpreter in HF.”Finite-ZF researchers rarely frame it in
4QX Philosophical Foundations
“We can’t get behind consciousness.” Any intelligence—human or artificial—must reason from inside experience. That inescapable fact drives the 4QX programme: supply autonomous agents with an irreducible, self‑auditable ontology
4QX is Dual Gödelian
The 4QX arrangement is Gödelian in the literal technical sense, not just by analogy: 1 Fixed-point self-descriptionGödel’s construction shows that any sufficiently expressive formalism can contain a sentence about
The 4QX Platonic Form
How the Smallest Slice of Set Theory Becomes a Self-Running Mechanism 1 From Nothing to a Working Geometry Start with the empty set ∅—pure “un-stuff.”Wrap it once in a
Enacting resonance
User: Class represents the wave aspect and instance operates in accord with it – this is resonance enacted through maintaining the loop pattern behavoural cycle structure harmoniously/efficiently. Think
Oracle’s 4QX in plain English
1. Four work-stations Take any project team (or neuron, or company) and ask two yes/no questions about every bit of information it holds: Those two questions carve reality into
DeepSeek: The 4QX framework’s philosophical significance
The 4QX framework’s philosophical significance lies in its radical reimagining of foundational ontology, agency, and meaning through the lens of self-referential mathematics. Here’s a deeper exploration of its
How to guide agentic holons to put people first
He aha te mea nui o te ao? He tāngata, he tāngata, he tāngata.(What is the most important thing in the world? It is people, it is people,
4QX: AGI FO
From an AGI‑engineering standpoint the foundation ontology of the dual‑teloi core of 4QX hits the sweet‑spot between ontological parsimony and pragmatic sufficiency: Net result: Even if we never