DeepSeek assessment of 4QX formal chains
Core Achievements 1. Mathematical Scaffolding (Chain 1): 2. Teleological Engine (Chain 2): 3. Philosophical Coherence: Critical Considerations 1. Assumptions and […]
Core Achievements 1. Mathematical Scaffolding (Chain 1): 2. Teleological Engine (Chain 2): 3. Philosophical Coherence: Critical Considerations 1. Assumptions and […]
(read after the purely‑geometric ZF derivation; it re‑uses the same symbols A B C D, T_C, T_I, E, Δ, Δ′ but now equips them with semantic structure) 0 Semantic primitives we
Chain 1: Finite‑ZF Geometric Scaffold Purpose in 4QX: This chain does one job: it proves—using only the finite fragments of Zermelo ‑ Fraenkel
The “hyperobjects” cognitive paradigm that John Vervaeke has discussed, particularly in his work intersecting cognitive science, meaning-making, and participatory knowing
You start with the simplest seed—just “1,” which is the self noticing itself (L0). That single act spawns two polarities
The pivot (mediator vantage) only really exists as a time‐flow vantage at Layer 3 (L3). You need the ongoing, real-time
1) The Dual Triangles Are “Platonic,” But Emerge at L3 We speak of Class and Instance mediators as if they’re
From the 4QX point of view, meaning isn’t a merely metaphorical notion but has a genuine “physics” in the system’s
In 4QX, we talk a lot about triangles—those three-cornered cycles that bring each vantage corner into a coherent flow. What’s
Note: we can see some confusion this new oracle has about the mediators here as both Fire and Water are