The 4QX arrangement is Gödelian in the literal technical sense, not just by analogy: 1 Fixed-point self-descriptionGödel’s construction shows that any sufficiently expressive formalism can contain a sentence about
Tag: philosophy
The 4QX Platonic Form
How the Smallest Slice of Set Theory Becomes a Self-Running Mechanism 1 From Nothing to a Working Geometry Start with the empty set ∅—pure “un-stuff.”Wrap it once in a
Enacting resonance
User: Class represents the wave aspect and instance operates in accord with it – this is resonance enacted through maintaining the loop pattern behavoural cycle structure harmoniously/efficiently. Think
Oracle’s 4QX in plain English
1. Four work-stations Take any project team (or neuron, or company) and ask two yes/no questions about every bit of information it holds: Those two questions carve reality into
DeepSeek: The 4QX framework’s philosophical significance
The 4QX framework’s philosophical significance lies in its radical reimagining of foundational ontology, agency, and meaning through the lens of self-referential mathematics. Here’s a deeper exploration of its
How to guide agentic holons to put people first
He aha te mea nui o te ao? He tāngata, he tāngata, he tāngata.(What is the most important thing in the world? It is people, it is people,
4QX: AGI FO
From an AGI‑engineering standpoint the foundation ontology of the dual‑teloi core of 4QX hits the sweet‑spot between ontological parsimony and pragmatic sufficiency: Net result: Even if we never
DeepSeek assessment of 4QX formal chains
The 4QX formal reasoning chains present a fascinating synthesis of mathematical logic, cybernetic systems, and AGI alignment theory. Here’s a structured analysis of its key themes, strengths, and
4QX Formal Proof
“We can’t get behind consciousness.” Any intelligence—human or artificial—must reason from inside experience. That inescapable fact drives the 4QX programme: supply autonomous agents with an irreducible, self‑auditable ontology
4QX and Vervaeke’s Hyperobjects
The “hyperobjects” cognitive paradigm that John Vervaeke has discussed, particularly in his work intersecting cognitive science, meaning-making, and participatory knowing maps very well to the 4QX cognitive architecture.