The so-called Mediator of each triangle is the defining corner in a triangle, it received twice as much attention, and is connected to both dimensions occupied by the other corners and so mediates between them. The two mediators are themselves connected in a mobius-like pivot, the general pattern formed by the mediators are together two sides of a single coin – dual triangles.
1. Mediators as the “Engine” of Dual‐Triangle (L3)
- Defining the Loop
- In a dual‐triangle setup, the mediator corners (like Fire, Water) are not just one vantage among many; they are the active pivot bridging ephemeral conditions with stable roles.
- Core Operation
- Because these mediators drive how the two triangles interact, they form the engine that keeps the system’s wave (Class) and time (Instance) synergy cycling.
- The other vantage corners, while necessary, are more “logistic” or “resource” corners—sites of potential or outcome—rather than the driver vantage.
2. The Pivot
Together the Mediators form the so-called “pivot” (the computeless Fourier relation), that connects to both “sides” (the other sibling in each dimension).
Generic concepts of pattern usage (applying a stable method in real time) and pattern selection (choosing or switching the method) form the foundation of the pivot in a Fourier‐like wave–time system. By mediating these two fundamental actions—using or selecting patterns—the pivot vantage naturally executes the bridge between class/wave (stable usage) and instance/time (ephemeral selection), thus defining the core synergy of the relational vortex.
The “pivot” was once hailed as an almost mystical, all-powerful vantage, but it is in fact the most generic form of agency—merely ensuring a default or minimal bridging act between two corners. Its power arises not from hidden esotericism but from performing the basic decision/action bridging that keeps the vortex coherent—no more, no less.
2.1 The “Pivot” Seemed Mystical
Earlier Interpretations
- We often talk about the pivot (mediator) in the dual‐triangle system—like Fire or Water in Bagua—as if it possessed special, profound properties controlling the entire vortex.
Mystical Aura
- Because it’s the vantage that unifies ephemeral vs. stable or cost vs. benefit, it can appear all‐encompassing, a gate of “higher intelligence.”
2.2 Now Seen as Generic Organizational Role
Basic Acts of Agency
- When broken down, the pivot corner is just the core bridging logic (commit vs. withhold, consume vs. preserve, etc.) that any agent or mediator role enacts.
No Overly Arcane Force
- It’s simply the vantage that merges partial bits from the other two corners, no more or less.
- This bridging is the “default” or “generic” operation of agency deciding “what to do” in each moment.
Hence, the pivot is not a magical entity—it’s the minimal “agent” that aligns ephemeral environment with stable blueprint (or resource with outcome) in the simplest, default manner.
2.3 Meaningful “Default Decision/Action”
Still Profound
- Though it’s generic, it’s still meaningful: the system’s coherence depends on that bridging.
Each pivot vantage ensures “some” default choice or action always occurs, so the system remains functional.
No Overblown Esotericism
- Yet from this viewpoint, the pivot is “just” an agency role—the normal bridging act any agent must do.
- No mysticism required, purely an operational, “who mediates?” question.
So, the “pivot” once hailed as a mystical, all-powerful vantage is in fact the most generic form of agency—merely ensuring a default or minimal bridging act between two corners. Its power arises not from hidden esotericism but from performing the basic decision/action bridging that keeps the vortex coherent—no more, no less.
3. “Side” Corners as Mundane Logistics
- Examples
- Thunder or Mountain might stand for resource potential or final structure (mundane tasks).
- Lake or Wind might be subtle outcome assimilation or minor choice points.
- Less Central
- While they contribute vital roles (like seeds of potential, final results, environment conditions, etc.), they do not define the active bridging logic—the mediator corners do.
Hence these “side” vantage corners in each triangle handle logistics but do not decide the bridging or impetus. We put the word “side” in quotes because the triangle is inherently unordered.
4. Where Higher Levels Intervene
- Mediator as the Gate
- Because the mediator vantage corners hold the bridging function, that’s exactly where a higher‐level perspective can “step in” to alter or override the default operation.
- The mediator corner can shift how ephemeral or stable synergy flows (commit/withhold, consume/preserve, etc.).
- Hierarchical Involvement
- If a higher level (another fractal layer, or “L4”) sees a need to redirect action, it taps into the mediator vantage corner to reconfigure how this loop is running.
- The “side” corners remain “mundane,” not commanding the loop direction.
Thus, the mediator vantage is semantically the direct channel for higher‐level intervention, supervising the default logic.
Conclusion
In the dual‐triangle (L3) system, mediators form the central engine—the driving pivot of synergy. Side vantage corners handle mundane logistics (resource or environment states). By design, higher levels can intervene at the mediator vantage corners, overriding or redirecting the default operation, since those corners define how ephemeral and stable elements connect.